Matric drama pupils, sitting for their final exam on Monday, were asked in a compulsory question to describe the symbolic rape of a baby using a
loaf of bread and a broomstick.
The question related to Lara Foot’s play Tshepang and asked pupils to describe how they would depict the rape of a child using the props specified.
Parents, teachers and pupils on Tuesday said they were horrified at the question and had complained to the department of education.
They have written to the national department of education asking that all drama pupils be immediately awarded the 15 marks attributed to that section.
‘Insensitive and immoral’
A senior department of education official said the issue will be raised at a meeting in Pretoria on Wednesday where the memo for the marking of the paper will be discussed.
“I am going to be making a loud clarion call, at that meeting, for the head of the person responsible for that question to roll,” said the official.
With more than 20 years’ experience as a drama expert, the official said there was nothing creative about the question and that it was “downright insensitive and immoral”.
“Schools are the custodians of everything that is right and appropriate in society. This is wrong, vulgar and a perpetuation of social injustice and gender stereotypes,” she said.
Pupils interviewed by The Witness said they were too embarrassed to repeat what they had written in their answers to the question.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, one pupil said she had been “sick to her stomach” with the question.
“While drama is all encompassing, we never expected such a question or topic. This is sickening to say the least. How does a 17-year-old describe the rape of a baby? We have been forced to imagine the unimaginable,” said the pupil.
Another pupil said one of her friends was most upset as she had a younger sister who had been sexually abused.
“She was in tears after the paper saying she thought she failed the paper because that question just brought everything right back. She said she did not even answer that question,” said the pupil.
Psychologist Tamryn Sprunt said the question was definitely inappropriate for 17-year-olds.
“What worries me is that we are forcing them to think about the brutality, violence, and viciousness involved in the rape of a baby. If a pupil was psychologically disturbed this could prove to be a catalyst for future behaviour,” said Sprunt.
Peter Mitchell, a drama lecturer at the University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg campus and himself a drama director, said: “This question is not about rape. It is about technique, directing technique and staging.
“It is a creative question about how you would get an actor to portray the rape in a non-realistic way, but still portray the horror of the situation.”
But activist groups condemned the question.
Child rights advocacy group Bobbi Bear’s administration director, Eureka Olivier said she was “absolutely disgusted”.
“I do not understand the concept of using a broomstick and a loaf of bread to depict such a thing. What are we teaching our children by having such a question in an exam paper?” she said.
Jess Foord Rape Crisis Centre trauma counsellor, Michelle Smith, said she was disturbed by the question.
“It also assumes that by asking them to depict such a thing, they have seen this happen. I believe it is incredibly insensitive to the thousands of children who are being sexually abused daily. You cannot put something like this in an exam paper and call it raising awareness.”
Read more: News24